The post “Plastic Choking Waterways…and Portfolios” on October 8, 2021, laid out which companies are responsible for the fetid plastic fouling the land, oceans, lakes and rivers around the world. Shareholders are well served by attention to the liability a company has accumulated as a consequence of their plastics output.
About 8.3
billion tons of plastic has been produced since the 1950s. Unfortunately, only about 9% of all plastic
is recycled and 12% is incinerated, leaving 79% of that plastic to sit in
landfills or circulate at large on land or in waterways.
The World Economic Forum in partnership with the Ellen MacArthur Foundation found that if
plastic pollution continues at the current pace, the world’s oceans will contain
more plastic than fish by the year 2050.
Yes, by 2050 the ocean could hold 937 million tons of plastic and just
895 million tons of fish.
Plastic is not
just unsightly. It is toxic. Scientists sponsored by the United Nations estimate
that as many as 1.0 million marine birds and 100,000 marine animals die after
eating plastic. At the current rate of plastic
proliferation, by 2050 at much as 99% of the world’s seabird populations will
be eating plastic. The plastic breaks up
into tiny pieces called ‘microplastics’ and enters the food chain. Researchers in the United Kingdom estimate Britons
already eat an average 70,000 microplastics each year.
Too small to see
with the human eye and capable of entering the digestive systems of all living
organisms, microplastic are particularly toxic.
These tiny bits of plastic can cause inflammatory lesions and oxidative
stress. Studies reveal the potential for
metabolic disturbances, neurotoxicity and increased cancer risk in humans.
As microplastics
proliferate in the food chain, it seems highly likely that major producers of
plastic could ultimately be vulnerable to class actions by the afflicted or
their health insurance companies. Some
plastic producers might argue that it would be difficult to trace a microplastic
back to the original producer and thus they cannot be sued. However, the problem appears to be mushrooming
to such as specter of danger that it seems plausible the largest of plastic
producers could be held liable as a group.
In this post we review the balance sheets for each of the top plastics producers to determine 1) whether a pollution liability is recognized on the balance sheet or at least in management’s discussion and 2) how well fortified the balance sheet might be against a large legal action.
ExxonMobil
(XOM: NYSE) is typical of the oil and
gas producers. There is no liability for
plastics pollution recognized on its balance sheet. Indeed, there is no contingency for any of
the myriad difficulties the world is now facing due to climate change that has
resulted from the drilling, processing combustion of petrochemicals. However, ExxonMobil has finally at least recognized
the risks of climate change and the potential for regulatory action by various
government jurisdictions, referencing the topic in one paragraph among the risk
factors faced by the company. However,
there is not one single reference to liabilities associated with derivative
products such as plastics.
Manufacturers of
intermediate and final goods may have less insulation against environmental
pollution. Dow Chemical (DOW: NYSE) has reported an accrued liability
totaling $1.2 billion for “probable environmental remediation and restoration
costs”, representing management’s best estimate of the price tag for future
clean-up. The company has also addressed
risks to the company’s assets and investment returns presented by the impact of
plastics on the environment. It is one
paragraph in the risks section of Dow’s annual report, but it does represent a
significant step forward for Dow in at least acknowledging its plastic products
can cause harm to human health and the environment. The paragraph even lists a number of single
use plastic products and forewarns that demand for its these items is at risk
as consumers “selectively reduce their consumption of plastic products.” More common place is a self-serving acknowledgement
of a risk to sales and earnings due to changing consumer preferences for
competitors’ non-plastic or recycled plastic products.
Dow is also set
apart among the plastics producers, by setting a goal of collection and reusing
or recycling at least one million metric tons of plastic waste by 2030. Dow has also pledge to have 100% of its
products sold into reusable for recyclable products by 2035.
PetroChina
Company Ltd. (PTR: NYSE) is representative
another approach by petrochemical producers.
As is required in China since 2018, the company pays an environmental protection
tax, for which the levy changes according to the amount of emissions relative
to pollutant discharge standards in China.
PetroChina has paid taxes totaling $66.1 million for the three years the
environmental tax has been in force. For
PetroChina this is the beginning and end of any concern for environmental
liability. This ‘pay the politicians’
tax and we are good’ mentality may very well protect operators in China and
other parts of Asia where the accumulation of wealth trumps the environment.
TOP SINGLE-USE PLASTIC POLYMER
PRODUCERS |
||||
Company |
SYM |
Operations |
% Plastic Waste |
Market Cap* |
ExxonMobil Corp. |
XOM |
Crude oil and natural gas producer |
5.9% |
$263.2 B |
Dow |
DOW |
Packaging, specialty plastics, intermediate chemicals |
5.6% |
$43.8 B |
Sinopec Shanghai |
SHI |
Oil and gas refining, synthetic fibers, polyethylene resins |
5.2% |
$5.8 B |
Indorama Ventures |
INDOY |
Petrochemicals, polyethylene resins |
4.6% |
$7.5 B |
Saudi Arabian Co. |
2222.SR |
Integrated oil and gas producer |
4.2% |
$2.0 T |
PetroChina Co. Ltd. |
PTR |
Integrated oil and gas producer |
4.0% |
$168.5 B |
LyondellBasell NV |
LYB |
Petrochemicals, olefins, polyolefins |
3.9% |
$32.8 B |
Reliance Industries |
RELIANCE.NS |
Oil and gas refining, distribution |
3.1% |
$240.0 B |
Braskem SA |
BAK |
Thermoplastic resin producer |
3.0% |
$8.3 B |
Alpek SA de CV |
ALPEKA.MX |
Polyester, plastics and chemicals producer |
2.3% |
$2.6 B |
|
|
Group Total |
41.8% |
|
*Foreign currency values converted to US dollars as of 10/11/21 |
TOP SINGLE-USE PLASTIC POLYMER
PRODUCERS |
|||||||
SYM |
% Plastic Waste |
Cash |
Total Assets |
Environment Contingency |
Book Value |
Footnote
Reference* |
|
XOM |
5.9% |
$4.4 B |
$332.8 B |
-0- |
$164.1 B |
None |
|
DOW |
5.6% |
$5.1 B |
$61.5 B |
$1.2 B |
$13.0 B |
Risk Factors |
|
SHI |
5.2% |
$7.2 B |
$45.5 B |
-0- |
$30.0 B |
None |
|
INDOY |
4.6% |
$14.9 B |
$453.2 B |
-0- |
$135.2 B |
None |
|
2222.SR |
4.2% |
$76.1 B |
$510.4 B |
-0- |
$293.6 |
Risk Factors |
|
PTR |
4.0% |
$18.6 B |
$389.7 B |
-0- |
$214.1 B |
None |
|
LYB |
3.9% |
$1.8 B |
$35.4 B |
-0- |
$8.0 B |
Risk Factors |
|
RELIANCE.NS |
3.1% |
$25 B |
$176.4 B |
-0- |
$106.7 B |
Sustainability
Pledge |
|
BAK |
3.0% |
$9.3 B |
$86.1 B |
-0- |
($3.9) B |
Risk Factors |
|
ALPEKA.MX |
2.3% |
$550.0 M |
$106.4 B |
-0- |
$2.2 B |
Circular Economy
Pledge |
|
Group Total |
41.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Reference to plastics pollution liability in management’s discussion
and analysis of financial results. |
|||||||
Neither the author of the Small Cap Strategist web
log, Crystal Equity Research nor its affiliates have a beneficial interest in
the companies mentioned herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment