In a continuing
series highlighting investment alternatives in emerging hydrogen fuel sector,
this post turns to a selection of fuel production and equipment developers that
have not yet achieved profitability.
Investors might still be interested in these early-stage developers for the
disruptive new technologies they bring to the hydrogen market. Market acceptance of those innovations could
win meaningful market share and drive stock value. The last post “Hydrogen Short-List” on September 17th
introduced the group.
The key to a
successful stake in early-stage companies is finding players that gained
foothold in the market and show enough momentum to scale up operations to a
profitable level. Which one is the
winner?
The second table below displays the results of a novel analysis aimed at sussing out which of these companies may be well positioned to carve out a good-sized share of the hydrogen fuel market. Our due diligence points are listed below:
·
First, we looked at partnerships,
not just any relationship, but those that are lined up to help win new
customers and sell hydrogen fuel products, equipment or services. The more substantial the partner, the better.
·
Sales announcements were also
scrutinized to provide a view on whether the company has built up some momentum
in winning new customers. The second and
third columns in the table below indicate whether the company had at least one new
customer announcement in the last year and then whether there was a more recent
announcement in the last three months of yet another new customer. Notably new partnerships or new development
projects were not included as ‘customers.’
·
Forecasted sales growth rates as
provided by analyst estimates offer additional insight into whether those who
follow the company closely, anticipate sales growth in the next year. Estimates for some of the companies based
outside the U.S. are not readily available, if such estimates had been published. Anticipated sales growth is an indicator that
the company’s products are embraced by customers. This action even in small numbers is likely
to have a lubricating impact on future sales.
·
A profitable gross margin indicates
whether the company has achieved adequate sales volume to cover fixed production
costs with enough contribution to realize a gain. Gross profits precede operating profits or
positive cash flow.
·
Finally, the ability of the company
to meet expectations is a signal the operation has achieved a level of
predictability or at least that management has been able to communicate the
company’s prospects to the investment community. This line of communication could be critical
in aiding investors as they await the much-anticipated report of first profits.
Based only on these
criteria, the surprising winner is Norway’s Nel, ASA (NEL: OL), which ticked more boxes on our novel due
diligence exercise than any of the others.
Nel sells hydrogen fueling stations and electrolysers to convert water
to hydrogen. The company sells its
renewable hydrogen solutions to across several industries and government energy
projects. Most recently Nel received a
purchase order from Scotland’s SGN gas distributor which has also embarked on a
project to become a provider of residential heating exclusively from hydrogen. Nel will provide SGN with a 5-megawatt
alkaline water electrolyser to begin the project. Nel will be the preferred provider of a 20-megawatt
hydrogen electrolizer facility for Spain’s electric utility Iberdrola.
Nel has several
market relationships, the most recent of which is a framework agreement with
energy service provider Aibel. Aibel,
which provides engineering, construction and maintenance services to oil, gas
and offshore wind projects, will help in managing large scale, complex projects.
Although Nel
does not appear to have reached a positive gross margin, the company has
reported recent growth. While we were
not able to determine if the company had delivered on analysts estimates, those
following the company and publishing estimates collectively see potential for
35% sales growth in the next year.
It is not
surprising that a European-based player would do best in our due diligence
effort. Europe has been well ahead of
renewable energy innovations for several decades, putting companies there in a
better position to solve technical problems as well as perfect business
models.
Runner up in our
exercise is FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL: Nasdaq), which lost out
to Nel only because its market partnership with Korea’s POSCO Energy ended up
in a courtroom. FuelCell did prevail in
the technology dispute with POSCO, but it is understandable that management may
be a bit shy about partnerships going forward.
Instead, FuelCell focuses on large scale power projects and regards its customers
as partners in the development process.
We might view this as a signal that FuelCell’s management team has
reached a level of sophistication and technical expertise that makes it less
dependent upon other parties to reach customers.
FuelCell has not
announced any new sales in the most recent three months, but that might be
understandable given that it typically sells into large projects that unfold
over a period of several months. For
example, the company recently completed construction and began commercial
operation at a 1.4-megawatt biofuels-to-hydrogen plant in cooperation with the
City of San Bernadino. An alternative
explanation for absence of recent customer announcements is that the company’s
engineering and sales teams are easily swamped with one or two projects and
struggles to keep the business pipeline primed.
FuelCell has struggled
with profitability and is still using cash resources to support operations. However, the company was finally been able to
beat analysts estimates in the most recently reported quarter ending June 2021. The group expects the company to deliver as
much as 9% growth the current year and another whopping 56% growth in 2022. The
complex project sources methane from municipal wastewater treatment digesters
and produces renewable hydrogen for electricity for the municipal water reclamation
processes.
The hydrogen
sector is finally coming into its own after having been considered too problematic
in terms of safety and cost. Hydrogen
developers have demonstrated that solutions are available to resolve safety
issues and the cost of renewable hydrogen has finally been brought to withing
competitive range. It is a sector that
requires study before taking a significant stake. Accordingly, it is not likely to be a stock
targeted by the new breed of speculative buyers. Besides answering the question of market
penetration and momentum that was the focus of this brief due diligence effort,
investors would do well to vet management’s talents and successes as well as
the company’s balance sheet.
SELECTED
HYDROGEN FUEL AND
EQUIPMENT COMPANIES |
|||
Company |
SYM |
Operations |
Market Cap* |
AFC Energy Plc |
AFC.LN |
Alkaline fuel cell systems, water electrolyzers |
$513.8 M |
Bloom Energy |
BE |
Solid-oxide fuel cells, including hydrogen |
$3.2 B |
Ballard Power Systems |
BLDP |
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells |
$4.7 B |
Ceres Power Holdings |
CWR.LN |
Solid-oxide fuel cells, including hydrogen |
$3.0 B |
Doosan |
336260.KS |
Power generation fuel cells, including hydrogen |
$2.8 B |
Fuel Cell Energy |
FCEL |
Fuel cell power plant operation, hydrogen distribution |
$2.2 B |
ITM Power, Plc |
ITM.LN |
Hydrogen energy storage, distribution systems |
$3.0 B |
Nel ASA |
NEL.NO |
Hydrogen production, storage, transport systems |
$2.2 B |
Plug Power |
PLUG |
Hydrogen fuel cell turn-key solutions |
$14.5 B |
|
|
|
|
*Foreign currency values converted to US dollars as of 9/20/21 |
SELECTED
HYDROGEN FUEL AND
EQUIPMENT COMPANIES |
||||||
SYM |
Market Partner |
Sale News in
Last Year |
Sale News in Last
3 mos. |
Forecast Growth
Rate |
Gross Margin |
Meet/ Exceed
Estimates |
AFC.LN |
Ricardo, ABB |
na |
No |
200% |
Neg |
na |
BE |
Heliogen, BakerHughes |
No |
No |
22% |
Neg |
Sometimes |
BLDP |
Quantron AG |
Yes |
Yes |
Neg |
Neg |
Never |
CWR.LN |
Doosan, Bosch |
na |
na |
na |
Neg |
na |
336260.KS |
Bosch |
No |
No |
Neg |
1.0% |
na |
FCEL |
None |
Yes |
Yes |
9% |
Neg |
Last Qtr Only |
ITM.LN |
Scottish Power |
Yes |
Yes |
na |
Neg |
na |
NEL.NO |
First Solar, SFC
Energy |
Yes |
Yes |
35% |
Neg |
Never |
PLUG |
Westech
Industrial |
Yes |
No |
Neg |
Neg |
Never |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Foreign currency values converted to US dollars as of 9/20/21 |
Neither the author of the Small Cap Strategist web
log, Crystal Equity Research nor its affiliates have a beneficial interest in
the companies mentioned herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment