Last month Eastman Chemical
Company (EMN: NYSE)
announced an expansion of its urethane extrusion line at one of its specialty
chemical plants. This one located near
Martinsville, Virginia makes paint protection films and window films. Urethane is perfect to protect surfaces in a
home or business. It is not brittle like
plastic, but has excellent tolerance for grease and oils. When exposed to the elements it does not rot
or degrade over time like rubber.
Shareholders
likely cheered the development in Virginia for potential addition to market
share. Eastman grabbed $9.6 billion in
sales from the specialty chemicals market in 2017, earning $1.4 billion in net
income or $9.47 in earnings per share.
Anyone who has waded through even just a few of posts here, knows I hold
a special interest in companies that generate cash. In 2017, Eastman turned a whopping 17.3% of
sales into operating cash flow. With so
much cash sloshing around Eastman is able to offer a tasty dividend of $2.24
per share, which at the current price provides a yield of 2.1%.
As appealing as
EMN shares might seem, Eastman’s urethane and most of its other products are
made from fossil fuels. Environmentally conscientious
investors may balk at dividends tainted by a supply chain that contributes to climate
change. Plastics that come out the other end of that chain offer durability but
are not readily biodegradable because of resistance to microbial action. They simply keep accumulating in the
environment.
Discerning
investors need not be frustrated in finding redeeming investments in specialty
chemicals. There are biodegradable polymers
made from both petroleum and renewable resources such as corn starch, cassava
roots or sugarcane. Polylactides or PLAs
are one an example. The most common way to make product PLAs is ring-opening
polymerization of lactide with a metal catalyst in a solution. Polylactides materials can be extruded with a
three-dimensional printer or an injection molding machine. Consumers will be most familiar with PLAs as
food containers, but the material is so versatile it can also be used for
everything from upholstery to medical implants.
PRODUCERS
OF POLYLACTIDE (PLA)
|
|||
Trade Name
|
Company
|
Country
|
Symbol
|
NatureWorks
|
Cargill
Dow
|
USA
|
Private
|
Galacid
|
Galactic
|
Belgium
|
Private
|
Lacea
|
Mitsui
Chemicals
|
Japan
|
4182: Tokyo
|
Lacty
|
Shimadzu
|
Japan
|
7701: Tokyo
|
Heplon
|
Golden
Technologies
|
USA
|
Private
|
CPLA
|
DIC
Global
|
Japan
|
4631:
Tokyo
|
Eco
plastic
|
Toyota
Corporation
|
Japan
|
TM: NYSE
|
Treofan
|
Treofan
Holdings GmbH
|
Netherlands
|
Private
|
PDLA
|
Corbion
NV (formerly Purac)
|
Netherlands
|
Private
|
Ecoloju
|
Mitsubishi
Plastics, Inc.
|
Japan
|
8058: Tokyo
|
Biomer
|
Biomer
|
Germany
|
Private
|
Nature has its
own ring-opening polymerization process that result in polymers. It is a part of the regular growth cycle of
living organisms. Starch and cellulose
are the two most common biopolymers from nature’s ‘specialty chemical factory,’
but lipids are another resource. From a
commercial standpoint, wheat gluten is a popular resource because it is
available in high quantity at low cost. Most
importantly gluten is fully biodegradable and the products that are produced
are non-toxic.
Chitin is the
second most abundant natural biopolymer.
It is found in the shells of crabs, shrimp, crawfish and insects. With a rigid and compact crystalline structure,
it is insoluble in water and alkaline media.
Unfortunately, chitin and its derivative chitosan are limited because of
insolubility in most solvents.
Nonetheless, it has found utility in cosmetics and in wound treatment.
The word in
biopolymers is starch. It is a low-cost
polyssacharide and available with abundance at low cost. Starch is mainly extracted from potatoes,
corn, wheat and rice. It is interesting that
there are few if any U.S. companies developing ‘starch polyesters.’ Perhaps this is because the chemical industry
really began formation in the U.S., providing the seeds to an entrenched supply
chain that does change speed or direction quickly. Among the European competitors there is
considerable scrambling for position in the starch polymer market. Italy-based Novamont was in a legal dust up
with Britain’s Biotec a few years back, but the two finally agreed to put their
patent infringement accusations aside.
COMMERCIAL
‘STARCH’ POLYESTERS
|
|||
Trade Name
|
Company
|
Country
|
Symbol
|
Mater-Bi,
Biocol
|
Novamont,
S.p.A.
|
Italy
|
Private
|
Solanyl
|
Rodenburg
Biopolymers, B.V.
|
Netherlands
|
Private
|
Ecofram
|
National
Starch (Akzo Nobel)
|
Netherlands
|
AKZA: AMS
|
Vegeplast
|
Vegemat
|
France
|
Private
|
Biolice
|
Limagrain
|
France
|
Public,
Non-quoted
|
Biotech
|
Biotech,
s.r.o.
|
Germany
|
Private
|
Bioplast
|
Biotec
|
England
|
Private
|
Plantic
|
Plantic
Technologies Ltd.
|
Australia
|
Private
|
Investors with
an interest in getting involved with biopolymers, the vehicle will need to be
at the private level. Only Akzo Nobel
has a trading stock that can be purchased through the Amsterdam Exchange. It seems more likely than not that the
biochemical companies will capture market share as the world turns to
sustainable materials. The next step in
the somewhat fragmented starch group will likely be a wave of mergers or
acquisitions. The result could be deeper
product lines and scale in production that provide the foundation for public
trading company stock.
Neither the author of the Small Cap Strategist web
log, Crystal Equity Research nor its affiliates have a beneficial interest in
the companies mentioned herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment