Most investment
scenarios in the renewable energy sector have revolved around growth as new
technologies are adopted and penetrate waiting markets. Companies in the renewable energy sector have
matured from development to operating stage and are beginning to generate
profits. Additionally, existing
companies have transformed into environmentally friendly players, offering new
opportunities for investors with a penchant for sustainability. To this end we applied a screen based on
dividend yield to the companies in our energy alternative indices.
It turns out
dozens of companies pay dividends out of earnings from either renewable energy generation
or some other product or service that saves energy. We picked out a half dozen of the companies
with exchange listings.
DIVIDENDS FROM ENERGY ALTERNATIVES
|
|||||
Company
Name
|
Symbol
|
Forward
Dividend Yield
|
Sales-to-Cash
Conversion Rate
|
Debt-to-Equity
|
Payout
Ratio
|
Centrica, Plc
|
CNA.L
|
9.0%
|
6.6%
|
183.7
|
120.0%
|
Covanta Holding
|
CVA
|
6.7%
|
13.9%
|
590.9
|
227.3%
|
General Electric
|
GE
|
3.4%
|
8.6%
|
157.6
|
48.5%
|
Methanex Corporation
|
MEOH
|
2.3%
|
25.7%
|
97.8
|
32.3%
|
National Grid, Plc
|
NGG
|
5.4%
|
32.9%
|
163.2
|
92.7%
|
Ormat Technologies
|
ORA
|
1.6%
|
35.5%
|
68.9
|
13.4%
|
Of course,
dividends are of no value if discontinued.
Investors need protections from risk.
We looked at the balance sheet strength.
The ability to raise capital is important in supporting a reliable
dividend payment policy. We found that
dividend generosity is also accompanied by a willingness to lever the balance
sheet with debt.
A strong balance
sheet is only part of the investment equation. The rate at which the company
converts sales to operating cash flow is also vital. After interest payments have been made,
operating cash flow can be used to cover capital investments and then
dividends. Impressive conversion rates
turned up among this small sample, providing encouragement for a dividend
motivated position.
However, it can
be precarious if a company must use most of its income to feed its dividend
promises. An appropriate limit might be
a payout ratio of 75%, leaving the balance for adjusting capitalization and growth
investments. Only three of the six
companies in our group have payout ratios below the limit. Interestingly, the three that do not meet our
payout criteria also have exceptionally high debt-to-equity ratios. An investor might have good reasons for
concern about the ability of these three to sustain a dividend.
Of course, there
are many more dividend paying companies in the world with strong sustainable
energy business models. Our three
measures are a good start to find the most reliable.
Neither the author of the Small Cap Strategist web
log, Crystal Equity Research nor its affiliates have a beneficial interest in
the companies mentioned herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment