Based on the view that government bonds and stocks are regarded as
competing assets by investors, a model has developed to extract the information
content inherent in the relationship between bond yields and equity
yields. The ratio of Bond Yield to Equity
Yield (BEER ratio or BEYR ratio) provides a measure of perceived risk in the
bond market versus the stock market. It
has become a popular means to indicate how much the equity markets are
expensive or cheap relative to bond markets.
How it Works
Whenever the equity yield has crossed above the bond yield, it implies
that even with no earnings growth, equity will deliver better returns than
debt. The ratio less than 1.00 can be a
harbinger of the bottom of the equity market.
Conversely, when equity yields are lower than bond yields, it suggests
equities are expensive relative to bonds.
A ratio greater than 1.00 is a call to caution for equity investors.
The current S&P 500 earnings yield is 3.79%. This level is well above the historic low
equity yield of 0.81% established in 2009 at the onset of the Great Recession,
but still not above the historic average.
The current ten-year treasury rate of 2.47% is the near all-time
historic low. The Bond Equity Earnings
Yield ratio is currently 0.65 (2.47% / 3.79%
= 0.65), suggesting equities are
attractive.
Using BEER
Before traders race off to acquire cheap equities, it is important to
consider alternative explanations for the relative levels of equity and bond
yields. For example, a ratio less than
1.0 could also be triggered by mispriced bond yields. What if the current bond market is not
adequately pricing risk? The U.S. bond
market has come through an exceptional period, during which the Federal Reserve
engaged in unprecedented stimulus and continuously suppressed interest rate
levels. It is not entirely clear that bond
prices accurately reflect the supply implications of the Fed’s ongoing balance
sheet divestiture plan. With another ‘bond
shoe’ yet to drop, it is questionable whether the BEER ratio is sufficiently reliable
to inform an investment strategy in the U.S. market.
Another study completed by the Leuthold Group, a financial research firm, found that the BEER ratio had no predictive value. The study was based on equity returns in the U.S. stock market during the period between 1878 and 2013. However, the study also determined that when Treasury yields rise above 6% there is some value in watching the BEER ratio.
Apparently, at higher bond yields investors have a different perception
of the merits of debt investing.
Otherwise bonds and stocks are viewed as separate assets classes and
investors only make an allocation choice between bonds or stocks. Thus the BEER or BEYR ratio may have more
value for entertainment than informing investment decisions in the U.S. equity
market.
Europe’s Story
A different conclusion was reached by a study of certain markets in
Europe. A study was completed by
Sweden’s Umea School of Business and Economics based on bond and equity yields
in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.
During the observation period between 1973 and 2014, following a BEYR
strategy would have led to excess return over the market portfolio in all four
markets. Additionally, the BEYR
portfolios had greater Sharpe ratios than those of the market portfolio,
indicating better risk adjusted returns and thus a sounder relationship between
risk and return. Yet these results were
not statistically significant and only hint at potentially positive results
from using a BEYR approach.
Fundamental Picks, Technical Trades
Despite the beguiling results of the current Bond Equity Yield Ratio,
it is more or less a busted signal for equity investors. A weak signal to begin with, there is good
reason why the BEER ratio is even less informative than ever based on today’s
bond market. Small-cap investors in
particular will need other strategies to underpin their investment
decisions. At the end of the day, it may
just be thorough fundamental analysis to choose strong companies followed by
artful technical analysis to make astute trading decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment