The Lieutenant
Governor of New York, Linda Hochul, has predicted that the state will be a
world leader in off-shore wind power
- a bold assertion for a state
that still derives three-quarters of its electric power from fossil fuels. Natural gas has become the most important fossil
fuel source. Yet in 2016, for the first
time, over one million megawatt hours of electricity were sources from solar
power and 24% of electricity is generated by renewable sources. This is remarkable given that just a few
years ago even that accomplishment was given very low odds. There appears to be some reasons for
confidence in other renewable power sources.
Just a month ago
the October 20th post “Firsts for
Deepwater Wind” outlined the success of that company in
building and operating five wind turbines off the coast of Block Island. Technically Block Island is part of Rhode Island,
but the only connection to the mainland is a ferry that runs to Block Island
from Montauk on New York’s Long Island.
The collective 30 megawatts of power production is sent to the New
England power grid. Deepwind has another project underway off the northeastern
shore of Long Island that is planned for another 90 megawatts capacity.Statoil's Amrumbank West Wind Farm |
Nonetheless,
Deepwind is only one, small company. For
New York’s leadership to be proven right, many more wind towers will need to
sprout up around the state. Statoil, SA
(STO: NYSE), the
Norwegian energy company, has made large scale wind power projects the
cornerstone of its renewable energy strategy.
The oil and gas heavy weight is committed to build the Empire Wind
project off the eastern shore of Long Beach Island in New
York. Straddling just over 79,000 acres,
the project will generate one gigawatt of power for New York customers.
With a market
capitalization of $66.4 billion, Statoil is a bit out of place in this forum
dedicated to small companies. Yet, any
discussion of renewable energy has to include the mega-cap oil and gas
leaders. Nearly all have made renewable
energy investments despite continuing to explore and develop fossil fuel
projects. Statoil has made clear the
view that a balanced energy mix is its objective. The company recently established its New
Energy Solutions Division to execute on the strategy and invested $200 million
in the Statoil New
Energy Solutions Fund.
Guidance is for renewable energy sources to reach 20% of capital
spending by 2030. Wind energy is a
favorite because Statoil engineers have concluded it is competitive with
natural gas without subsidies.
Statoil has
plenty of cash to fund capital investments.
At the most recent financial report date at the end of September 2017,
the Company has $18.6 billion in cash and equivalents. Only about $11 billion in cash is needed for
working capital, leaving as much as $7.5 billion in excess cash. There is likely to be more cash at the end of
the next quarter. Over the last year
Statoil converted to cash 28% out of every sales dollar.
With a company
the size of Statoil a few investments in wind power make very little difference. Investors in the company are concerned about
the earnings that derive mostly from sales of oil and gas. The stock currently trades at 17.1 times
forward earnings. This compares to an average trailing price-earnings
multiple of 22.2 times for the oil and gas refinery group.
Statoil appears
undervalued against its peers, and even more attractive against its own growth
prospects. Analysts have predicted
earnings growth in excess of 25% over the next five years. The stock’s Price-Earnings to Growth ratio is
just 0.60. The ratio is even more
impressive if the forward dividend yield of 4.2% is considered.
A position in an
oil and gas company may not be for every investor. Yet if the State of New York is to achieve
its goal for clean energy, companies like Statoil are likely to be a central
player.
Neither the author of the Small Cap Strategist web
log, Crystal Equity Research nor its affiliates have a beneficial interest in
the companies mentioned herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment