Last month wind
tower manufacturer Broadwind Energy (BWEN:
Nasdaq) announced a major new tower order from a
major U.S. wind turbine manufacturer. The customer was not named, but the
likely suspects are not hard to round up.
General
Electric (GE: NYSE)
is the largest U.S.-based wind turbine producer with about 9.1% of the total
world market according to BTM Navigant, an industry research firm. While substantially smaller in size, Northern Power
Systems, PacWind and Xzeres
are also important competitors in the wind energy industry. Clearly
General Electric as a customer has the greatest financial strength and
therefore more credibility - two traits that have been in short supply at
Broadwind of late.
The company’s current
chief executive officer, Stephanie Kushner was recently promoted to the post
from the position of chief financial officer, a position held since 2009. No new CFO has been named. Broadwind also recently announced the resignation
of the controller and intentions to “consolidate corporate financial functions.” The C-suite at Broadwind is not well populated
these days, leading some shareholders to question leadership and
direction. The big new order helps calm
critics.
Valued at a
total of $137 million, the recent wind tower order calls for deliveries over a
three-year period ending in 2019. That
means roughly $45 million in additional revenue per year - a
major win for the company. In the twelve
months ending March 2016, Broadwind reported a total of $196.7 million in total
sales. Thus the new order represents a
23% increase in incremental annual sales.
Broadwind
reported a net loss of $10.1 million in the twelve months ending March
2016. However, EBITDA (earnings before
interest, depreciation and amortization) was near breakeven at $111,000 and
operations generated $13.1 million in cash flow. Barring poorly negotiated margins on the new
contract, Broadwind should be able to at least post positive EBITDA if not a
net profit as the company works through the new contract. There is only a single analyst with a
published estimate for Broadwind.
Surprisingly, that analyst reacted to the new contract announcement with
even deeper quarter losses than before in 2016, as well as a deeper loss in the
year 2017.
The forecast reduction
was not encouraging for shareholders, but most appear to have shrugged off the
opinion of a single analyst. The stock
had already been on an up-trend since February 2016, riding the wave of renewed
interest in U.S. equities. The stock
gapped higher on the new contract announcement in early June 2016, but has since
given up the entire gain.
As encouraging
as new business appears, the fact that Broadwind has not found an operating configuration
that produces profits is of far greater concern. The company recently decided to divest of its
services division, retaining the towers and weldments businesses. Eliminating the unprofitable services
division will be beneficial, but it will not fix the problems in the remaining
business that is also unprofitable. Five
years ago the company initiated a restructuring plan to right-size its manufacturing
base and reduce fixed costs. Two
production facilities were idled and 10% of the workforce was laid off. The efforts have led to positive cash flows
in continuing operations, but net profitability remains elusive. Indeed, the gross profit margin shrank to
9.2% in the year 2015.
Neither the author of the Small Cap Strategist web
log, Crystal Equity Research nor its affiliates have a beneficial interest in
the companies mentioned herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment