The health
crisis imposed by spread of a novel, highly virulent coronavirus has disrupted
the delicate rebalancing process that has been playing out slowly across of the
global uranium supply sector. In March
2011, the nuclear power industry and the uranium supply chain supports it was
sent into a tailspin by an earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan’s
eastern coast and triggered contamination at the Fukushima Nuclear Power
Plant. Nuclear power was suddenly
considered too risky, leading to existing plant closures and new plant delays. Demand for uranium evaporated, leaving selling
prices for uranium ‘yellow cake’ at a depressed level ever since.
By the beginning
of 2020, the global nuclear utility industry had recovered to the point
Industry research firm MarketWatch estimated there would be demand for 182
million pounds of uranium concentrate for reactor operations during the
year. As in the last several years
uranium production was expected to be well short of that figure as utility
companies continue to rely on excess inventories. Only those uranium mining companies with the
low marginal cost structure have remained in operation.
Absorbing the
second natural crisis event within ten years will not be easy for the uranium
supply chain. At the beginning of 2020,
MarketWatch had estimated there would be approximately 140 million pounds of
production during the year. Before the
end of the first quarter that estimate was no longer valid. Most uranium mines ceased operations for
several weeks in February, March and April 2020 in compliance with government
orders to shutdown all but essential services as a tactic to slow the spread of
the coronavirus. Even once operations
resumed, production has been impacted by new safety requirements to ensure
worker health.
Now MarketWatch
is estimating world uranium production could come in closer to 120 million
pounds in 2020. After having relied
year-after-year on inventories, the uranium consumers may be faced with the
first uranium supply short-fall in over a decade. Given that demand for uranium is relatively
price inelastic - that is uranium consumers are not
particularly sensitive to price changes
- many uranium industry
enthusiasts are anticipating higher prices memorialized in supply contracts
between utility companies and uranium suppliers.
As this dynamic
plays out U.S. uranium producers are also watching domestic government
policies. The Trump Administration
budget includes a request for $150 million for the U.S. Department of Energy to
build a uranium stockpile over the next ten years. Even if the budget request is finally
adopted, it is not likely those purchases could impact uranium pricing that
typically is set in world commodity markets.
Besides triggering a restart of operations at existing operations, an
increase in price level could entice developers to accelerate projects for new
mines.
There are a
number of promising properties where work is already underway or could be
resumed in short-order. Crucial to the
speed at which developers might try to come to market with new projects is the
anticipated cost of operation. It does
not make sense to begin production when marginal costs are below current
prices. At these new projects developers
have a chance to use cost-saving technologies are processes that improve
operating economics.
SELECTED URANIUM DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
|
||
Company
|
Symbol
|
Recent Development Progress
|
ALX
Resources Corp.
|
AL: TSX
|
Option
on Close Lake project in Athabasca area in Saskatchewan
|
Azarga
Uranium
|
AZZ: TSX
|
Seeking
approvals for construction at Dewey Burdock in South Dakota
|
Azincourt
Energy Corp.
|
AAZ: TSX
|
Phase
One drilling program at East Preston project in Athabasca area
|
Cameco
Corp.
|
CCO:
TSX
|
Most
development work suspended; holds stake in Close Lake property among other
projects headed by junior partners
|
Denison
Mines Corp.
|
DML: TSX
|
Work
suspended on environmental assessment at Wheeler River in Athabasca area
|
Energy
Fuels, Inc.
|
UUUU: NYSE
|
Largest
producer in U.S. at White Mesa Mill in Utah and Nicholas Range in Wyoming;
Alta Mesa in Texas on stand-by
|
Fission
Uranium Corp.
|
FCU: TSX
|
Pre-feasibility
study completed for Patterson Lake South in Athabasca area in Canada
|
Forum
Energy Metals
|
FMC: TSX
|
Diamond
drilling started at Fir Island project in Athabasca area
|
IsoEnergy
Ltd.
|
ISO: TSX
|
Chemical
assay work started at Larocque East project in Athabasca area and additional
drilling planned in Summer 2020
|
NexGen
Energy Ltd.
|
NXE: TSX
|
Feasibility
and environmental assessment planned for Rook One project in Athabasca area
|
Orano
S.A.
|
Private
|
Interests
in several development projects, including Preston, Hook Lake and Fir Island
|
Purepoint
Uranium Group
|
PTU: TSX
|
Continued
drilling work at Hook Lake project in Athabasca area in Saskatchewan
|
Uranium
Energy Corp.
|
UEC: NYSE
|
Reno
Creek project in Texas remains in pre-construction stage; drilling at Burke
Hollow in Texas postponed
|
Investing in
these companies is an exercise in optimism.
Most of the selected developers included in the tables here have yet to
realize sales of uranium. Rather than
valuation metrics, investors must look at the quality of the resource assets
and management’s track record for delivering successful projects. For those who are not interested in such due
diligence, the more established mining companies with interests in development
projects may be a better way to take a stake in uranium development. Cameco, Denison and Energy Fuels all have
reach commercial stage. While only
Cameco remains profitable at the present time, Denison and Energy Fuels may
again have their days in the sun as well.
Indeed, loyal holders of DML and UUUU shares are counting on seeing
profits again when uranium regains its energy sector mojo.
MARKET DATA FOR SELECTED URANIUM DEVELOPERS
|
||||||
Company
|
Symbol
|
Sales
|
ROA
|
Mkt Cap
|
P / EPS
|
P /
BkVal
|
ALX
Resources Corp.
|
AL: TSX
|
na
|
neg
|
CN$5.3 M
|
neg
|
0.54
|
Azarga
Uranium
|
AZZ: TSX
|
na
|
neg
|
CN$31.5 M
|
neg
|
0.61
|
Azincourt
Energy Corp.
|
AAZ: TSX
|
na
|
neg
|
CN$7.0 M
|
neg
|
1.82
|
Cameco
Corp.
|
CCJ: NYSE
|
CN$1.9 B
|
2.1%
|
US$3.9 B
|
72.4
|
1.11
|
Denison
Mines Corp.
|
DML: TSX
|
CN$16.2 M
|
neg
|
CN$369.3 M
|
neg
|
1.81
|
Energy
Fuels, Inc.
|
UUUU: NYSE
|
US$4.6 M
|
neg
|
US$188.9 M
|
neg
|
1.36
|
Fission
Uranium Corp.
|
FCU: TSX
|
na
|
neg
|
CN$165.4 M
|
neg
|
0.51
|
Forum
Energy Metals
|
FMC: TSX
|
na
|
neg
|
CN$10.3 M
|
neg
|
4.75
|
IsoEnergy
Ltd.
|
ISO: TSX
|
na
|
neg
|
CN$53.1 M
|
neg
|
1.01
|
NexGen
Energy Ltd.
|
NXE: TSX
|
na
|
neg
|
CN$470.8 M
|
neg
|
3.98
|
Orano
S.A.
|
Private
|
na
|
na
|
na
|
na
|
na
|
Purepoint
Uranium Grp
|
PTU: TSX
|
na
|
neg
|
CN$7.8 M
|
neg
|
7.88
|
Uranium
Energy Corp.
|
UEC: NYSE
|
na
|
neg
|
US$207.8 M
|
neg
|
2.94
|
Neither the author of the Small Cap Strategist web
log, Crystal Equity Research nor its affiliates have a beneficial interest in
the companies mentioned herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment