Smoke and blood is the mix of steel….
Steel barb-wire around The Works.
Steel guns in the holster of the guards at the gates of The Works.
Steel ore-boats bring the loads clawed from the earth by steel, lifted
and
Lugged by arms of steel, sung on its way by the
clanking clam-shells.
The runners now, the handlers now, are steel; they dig and clutch and
haul;
they hoist their automatic knuckles from job to job;
they are steel making steel.
Fire and dust and air fight in the furnaces;
The pour is timed, the billets wriggle; the clinkers are dumped.
Liners on the sea, skyscrapers on the land; diving steel in the sea,
climbing steel in the sky.
Smoke and Steel, Carl Sandberg
As Carl Sandberg
described with such eloquence in the poem “Smoke and Steel,” production of steel is a highly consumptive affair, using vast amounts of energy, eating up raw
materials and taking a toll on those who labor at the task. The World Steel Association (WSA) indicates there were
1,621 million metric tons of steel produced in 2015. As much as 40% of the cost of steel is
related to energy. The WSA estimates
about half of the energy is sourced from coal, 35% from electricity and 5% each
from natural gas and other gases.
Renewable energy sources have not made an appreciable entrance into the
steel making industry.
To its credit, the
industry has attempted to create efficiency in the steel making processes. For example, by-product gases from the coke
oven and blast furnace can be captured and re-used, reducing the need to buy
additional fossil fuel. Analysis of the
German steel making industry suggests recovery of by-product gases saves as
much as 300 million cubic meters of natural gas each year.
Now the steel
industry is on the cusp of its first major technological innovation in decades. This innovation also promises the dramatic energy efficiency, far outpacing the contributions of recycling gas by-products.
Recent improvements
in materials science are making it possible to capitalize on a mass-production
technique invented by Henry Bessemer over 150 years ago. His idea was to cast strips of steel directly
rather than as large ingots that are subsequently shaped into a final product
by large rolling machines. Bessemer
wanted to pour molten steel between two counter-rotating rollers that would
work much like a an old fashioned roller washing machine. The water-cooled rollers would squeeze the
metal into a sheet. Unfortunately, the
mechanics of the ‘twin rollers’ idea were an obstacle that has gone unresolved
until recently.
Steel producer
and recycler Nucor (NUE: NYSE) has put
Bessemer’s idea into action with its Castrip
product. The company touts the quality
of Castrip steel as cast at or near
its final required thickness. This
eliminates the need for additional hot or cold rolled reductions that add to
cost and makes possible material properties that better meet customer needs. Nucor is saving as much as 80% of the energy
costs associated conventional steel making processes. The company also claims the process requires
a substantially smaller footprint, saving as much as 50% on land resources as
well. Nucor has begun licensing the Castrip process to other steel makers.
Investors with a
mind to tap the source of energy efficiency and conservation could take a stake
in Nucor. The company posted a 11.2%
return on equity in the year 2016 and converted 10.7% of its sales into
operating cash flow. Its shares are
valued at 15 times times forward earnings and offer a dividend yield of 2.5%. Analysts following Nucor expect significant
earnings growth over the next couple of years, suggesting the ratio of price
earnings to growth plus yield is at an attractive 0.70.
If a small-cap seems more appealing, Germany’s
Salzgitter AG (SZG: F or SZGPF: OTC) is another steel
maker adopting energy-saving processes.
Salzgitter is using a single belt caster, which casts liquid steel
directly onto a single horizontally moving belt. This process also allows for similar energy
and resources conservation as Nucor’s twin-roller process. The company has been widely recognized in
Germany for energy efficiency.
Salzgitter
delivers near 8.6 billion Euros in annual sales, earning an operating profit
margin near 0.8%. In the most recently
reported twelve months the company reported a net loss, frustrating
conventional valuation methods.
However, Salzgitter converts approximately 5.3% of sales to operating
cash flow, providing internally generated resources for investment in new
equipment and plant innovation.
Salzgitter is also consistent dividend payer. The forward yield at the current price level
is near 0.76%.
Salzgitter’s
metrics may not be as attractive as Nucor.
However, Salzgitter’s environmental track record may be a bit shinier. A position in SZG is thus a purer play on
energy efficiency and environmental responsibility than NUE even as the
fundamentals are not as attractive.
Neither the author of the Small Cap Strategist web
log, Crystal Equity Research nor its affiliates have a beneficial interest in
the companies mentioned herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment